Skip to content
CouncilHound
← Projects & topics
Plan or program · on the record since 2025 · discussed in 24 transcribed meetings

Special Use Permit

Special Use Permits (SUPs) are a land use approval mechanism used by the City of Fairfax under Chapter 110 (Zoning) to authorize specific uses subject to conditions, and are distinct from rezonings in that they carry a time limit — automatically expiring after two years unless a building permit (or, under a pending clarifying amendment, an equivalent zoning permit) is issued.

The City of Fairfax 2035 Comprehensive Plan is the city's primary long-range land use and policy document, guiding development, housing, transportation, and related decisions. A five-year review process culminated on October 8, 2024, when City Council unanimously adopted Resolution R-24-30 approving the updated plan dated September 27, 2024.

Other mentions
  • City of Fairfax Community Development and Planning

    Staff noted that special use permits have a time limit associated with them, distinguishing them from zoning regulations which are changed in perpetuity.

  • Jun 8, 2026Planning Commission · item 8ain progress
    Post-submission work session on proposed Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning), Special Use Permit, Special Exceptions, and Major Certificate of Appropriateness for 4085-4117 Chain Bridge Road

    A post-submission work session was held; the Planning Commission received a staff presentation and provided feedback on the proposed Special Use Permit for 4085-4117 Chain Bridge Road.

  • Public hearing and Council action on proposed amendments to Chapter 110 (Zoning) relating to Detached Accessory Dwelling Units

    Public comment raised opposition to ADUs being approved without a special use permit; the ordinance as adopted does not require a special use permit for conforming detached ADUs.

    failedSubstitute motion to defer consideration of the detached ADU zoning amendments until September 8, 2026.
    ✓ Hall✓ McQuillen✓ Peterson✕ Amos✕ Bates✕ Hardy-Chandler
    passedApprove an ordinance amending Chapter 110 (Zoning) to amend portions of articles and sections relating to Detached Accessory Dwelling Units.
    ✓ Amos✓ Bates✓ Hardy-Chandler✓ Peterson✕ Hall✕ McQuillen
  • Sep 8, 2026City Council · item 8aapproved
    Public Hearing: Special Use Permit – 10230 Antietam Avenue (Naila Ayoub Daycare)

    The Special Use Permit pursuant to City Code Section 110-3.5.5.D.8 was approved unanimously to allow a family day care home for up to 12 children at 10230 Antietam Avenue, with five conditions including state licensing, operator residency, and no outdoor play before 8:00 a.m.

    passedApproval of the Special Use Permit for Naila Ayoub to allow a family day care home for up to 12 children at 10230 Antietam Avenue.
  • Oct 27, 2026City Council · item 7adeferred
    Public hearing and Council action on a Special Use Permit amendment request from Mantua Hills Swimming Association for 3425 Pickett Rd

    The Special Use Permit amendment requested by Mantua Hills Swimming Association to modify conditions governing tennis court and swimming pool hours of operation at 3425 Pickett Rd was deferred to January 12, 2027 at staff request.

In full

SUPs have appeared across multiple proceedings in different capacities: as background context in HHCAB strategy sessions (September 2025); as a topic of staff explanation before the Planning Commission and Council regarding their time-limited nature versus perpetual zoning changes (May–October 2026); as the approval vehicle for a specific family daycare at 10230 Antietam Avenue (approved unanimously, September 8, 2026); and as the subject of an amendment request by Mantua Hills Swimming Association for 3425 Pickett Road regarding hours of operation (deferred to January 12, 2027). A post-submission work session was also held before the Planning Commission for a proposed SUP at 4085–4117 Chain Bridge Road (June 8, 2026), with no vote taken.

Separately, the July 28, 2026 adoption of the Detached ADU ordinance was notable in that it explicitly does not require an SUP for conforming detached ADUs, a point that drew public opposition.